The name of the organization in French is Organisation internationale de normalisation and in Russian, Международная организация по стандартизации ( Mezhdunarodnaya organizatsiya po standartizatsii).
DEFINE ISO ISO
The three official languages of the ISO are English, French, and Russian. The new organization officially began operations in February 1947. In October 1946, ISA and UNSCC delegates from 25 countries met in London and agreed to join forces to create the new International Organization for Standardization. It was suspended in 1942 during World War II, but after the war ISA was approached by the recently formed United Nations Standards Coordinating Committee (UNSCC) with a proposal to form a new global standards body. The organization began in the 1920s as the International Federation of the National Standardizing Associations (ISA). Plaque marking the building in Prague where the ISO predecessor, the ISA, was founded The standards also serve to safeguard consumers and the end-users of products and services, ensuring that certified products conform to the minimum standards set internationally. By enabling products from different markets to be directly compared, they facilitate companies in entering new markets and assist in the development of global trade on a fair basis. The standards help businesses increase productivity while minimizing errors and waste. Use of the standards aids in the creation of products and services that are safe, reliable, and of good quality. More than twenty thousand standards have been set, covering everything from manufactured products and technology to food safety, agriculture, and healthcare. It is the world's largest developer of voluntary international standards, and it facilitates world trade by providing common standards among nations. The International Organization for Standardization is an independent, non-governmental organization, the members of which are the standards organizations of the 165 member countries. 8 International Standards and other publications.5.1 Joint technical committee with IEC for information technology standards.If an auditor wants to express a concern about a weak practice, it should be identified as an opportunity for improvement, not an observation. The findings can indicate conformity or nonconformity. In summary, an auditor gathers facts (evidence) and draws conclusions (findings). ISO 19011:2018, 3.8, states that “audit evidence” is obtained through observation, measurement, test, or by other means. However, observations can relate to both conforming and nonconforming situations. Since some auditors identify concerns about weak practices as observations, the term has taken on a negative connotation. It’s just that audit reports tend to focus on findings that are nonconformities.Īn “observation” is a statement of fact made during an audit and substantiated by objective evidence. It states that findings can indicate conformity or nonconformity, or be opportunities for improvement. ISO 19011:2018, the auditing guideline standard, defines “audit findings” in 3.10 as the results of an evaluation of the collected audit evidence against audit criteria. Is that always the correct interpretation? When you hear about an audit finding or observation, you probably think that a problem or concern is being reported. ISO 9000:2015, 3.6.10, cautions that using the term “defect” has legal connotations, particularly those associated with liability issues. If the nonconformity relates to the intended or specified use of a product or service, the correct term becomes “defect”. That being the case, it is preferable to use the terms Conformity and Nonconformity. What does that mean? Well, “deprecated” refers to a term that is considered obsolete and being phased out. Does it really matter? ISO 9000:2015 3.6.11 states that although conformance is synonymous with conformity, it is deprecated. Some auditors use “conformance” and “nonconformance”. As expected, “conformity” is defined in 3.6.11 as the fulfillment of a requirement. ISO 9000:2015 3.6.9 defines the non-fulfillment of a requirement as a “nonconformity”. Are you using the right term? What do you call it when a requirement is not met?
0 kommentar(er)
